SPY THEATRE . COM
SPY THEATRE . COM

ISLAMIC DOCTRINE "SHARIAH"

Obama addresses the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly on September 25, 2012: EZRA LEVANT: Sun News Network-CANADA

Barack Hussein Obama Quote: ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam’: Did Churchill have a future? WHAT SAY WINSTON!

"The Soldier's Prayer," written by a Turkish poet: "The minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks and the faithful our army."

MOSQUES: MILITARY SHARIAH FORTS USED FOR WAR

The Mosque: Center of Religion, Politics and Dominance
by Clare M. Lopez
Originally published by the Gatestone Institute
August 6, 2013

...Turning back to the mosque as a center of military -- as well as political and religious -- activity in intra-Islamic fitna [upheaval], as in the case of the Khalid Ibn al-Walid Mosque in Homs, Syria, it is worth concluding with some consideration of the role the mosque, or masjid in Arabic, traditionally has played in these periodic convulsions within the Islamic world. According to Sam Solomon, a former Islamic jurist who was born a Muslim and trained in shariah for fifteen years before converting to Christianity, "Islam is not simply a religion. Islam is a socio-political system. It is a socio-political, socio-religious, socio-economic, socio-educational, socio-judicial, legislatic, militaristic system cloaked in, garbed in religious terminology."
The masjid (its Arabic root means to prostrate, as in worship) is the place where shariah, believed to be the immutable law of Allah, is upheld and implemented. As such, it is the central structure in an Islamic society: it is a gathering place, place of worship, and a place for teaching Islamic doctrine—but also a base of operations, military operations, the command and control hub for the commanders of the Islamic armies to plan their next offensives in the incessant wars of conquest. They declared jihad [war in the cause of Islam] from the mosques. Official delegations from the tribes met at Islam's early mosques; pledges of loyalty were given and accepted, alliances formed, and treaties proposed and signed. In this way, affairs of state were conducted in such mosques, underlining the intrinsically political nature of Islam from its earliest inception.
...Syed Abul A'ala Maududi, another key theoretician of Islam, left no room for doubt about the nakedly political objectives of Islam:
"Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program."
The Islamic mosque is the bricks and mortar institutionalization of those objectives. > FULL ARTICLE < 27

Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson

Video: Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson Explains What Will ‘Do the Muslims In’… and ‘The Chinese’by Tommy Christopher December 31st, 2013 

The controversy surrounding Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson has focused mainly on his comments about homosexuality and bestiality, and to a lesser degree, his assertion that black people in the Jim Crow South were happier, but in the GQ interview that started it all, Robertson also equated Muslims with Nazis. Like his other controversial statements, this is nothing new for Robertson, who explained to an Arkansas congregation, in 2008, what would “do in the Muslims,” as well as “the Chinese,” and that Muslims are “famous for murder.”

In the middle of his speech before the Hillsboro Church of Christ in El Dorado, AR, Robertson asked “What will do the Muslims (pronounced “Moose-limbs”) in?”

Brandishing his Bible, Robertson answered “Violations of the law, that’s what’ll do ‘em in.”

“What will do the Chinese in, if they don’t turn to Jesus?” Robertson asked, then answered “One violation.”

Later in the speech, Robertson talked about those who are “controlled by the evil one.”

“That’s why they run jet aircraft into buildings, because they’re under control of the evil one, that’s why they rob and kidnap and rape and pillage, because they’re under control of the evil one. That’s why they murder, from the Nazis, to the Shintoists, to the communists to this latest crop!”

“You say ‘Why do they murder, why do they hate us?!” Robertson bellowed, slapping the podium. “Because all of them, those four groups, 80 years of history, they all want to conquer the world, they all rejected Jesus, and they’re all famous for murder. Nazis, Shintoists, communists, and the Muhammadists.”

In case anyone thought he was referring only to some bad apples, Robertson added “Every one of them, the same way.”

Toward the end of the speech, though, Robertson did tell the congregation to “Love your neighbor,” adding “I don’t care if he’s black, I don’t care if he’s one of these Muslims.”

Here’s video of Robertson’s 2008 remarks about Muslims:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/video-phil-robertson-explains-what-will-do-the-muslims-in-and-the-chinese 

Hamza Kashgari is accused of writing blasphemous tweets about Prophet Mohammad

Saudi Journalist Facing Trial for Tweets About Prophet Muhammad
http://www.theworld.org/2012/02/saudi-hamza-kashgari-twitter

By The World ⋅ February 13, 2012 ⋅
Insulting the prophet is considered blasphemous in Islam and is punishable by death in Saudi Arabia.
Hamza Kashgari is accused of writing blasphemous tweets about Prophet Mohammad.
Malaysian authorities have deported Hamza Kashgari, a Saudi journalist accused of insulting the Prophet Muhammad in a tweet.

Hamza Kashgari's tweets, which have now been deleted from his account: >MORE< 26

SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL

WINSTON CHURCHILL'S COMMENTS ON ISLAM

[ Forenote: Sir Winston Churchill has been recognized as one of the greatest men of the late nineteenth and of the twentieth century. He was an extraordinary war leader to whom the Western World must be forever in debt. He was a prophet in his own time as this quotation, written well over 100 years ago, demonstrates.]

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

[ Postnotes: (1) Sir Winston, as an officer of the British Army, served in the Sudan and in the Crimean War; in both instances against the Muslims. These experiences gave him ample opportunity to observe the structure of Islamic society. (2) Churchill's quotes were taken from the volume: Sir Winston Churchill; "The River War", first edition, Volume II, pages 248-250, published by Longmans, Green & Company, 1899. (3) If Sir Winston were alive today, it is doubtful that a person in Great Britain criticizing Islam publicly could be arrested, and then fined or jailed, and even more doubtful that any Muslims would be sitting in the English Parliament! ] http://www.allaboutmuhammad.com/winston-churchillrsquos-comments-on-islam.html

Saudi King Abdullah & Mohammad "Buddy" Obama

Saudi Arabia declares atheists terrorists under new laws targeting citizens who 'call for secular thought in any form'

By SIMON TOMLINSON 1 April 2014  Targeting thought crimes: A new decree by King Abdullah (above) will treat atheists and political dissidents as enemies of Saudi Arabia just like violent terrorist groups Saudi Arabia has officially identified atheists as terrorists in sweeping new laws that threaten up to 20 years in prison for almost any criticism of the government or Islam. The regulations place secular citizens who commit thought crimes in the same category as violent terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda's Yemen branch and Saudi Hezbollah.

Under the new decree by King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia will jail for up to 20 years anyone who fights in conflicts abroad - an apparent move to deter Saudis from joining rebels in Syria.

But the law also applies to any Saudi citizen or a foreigner residing in the kingdom that 'calls for atheist thought in any form or calls into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.'

The laws have been denounced by human rights groups for making no distinction between religious expression and violent extremism. 'Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism,' said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

The counter-terrorism measure have also been mocked by Al Qaeda's Yemen branch which said they would not deter the Islamist group's fighters and that they proved the kingdom was in the pay of the United States. In an online statement, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) also said Riyadh's designation of the Muslim Brotherhood - a group whose political wings have contested elections in several countries - as a terrorist organisation proved that secular authorities would never tolerate Islamist groups.

American reporter who posted controversial images of Saudi Royal family during Obama's visit becomes Twitter sensation in repressive Middle Eastern state AQAP, seen as one of the most dangerous Al Qaeda branches after it plotted attacks on international airliners, is thought to have several hundred Saudi militants fighting alongside Yemeni counterparts against the government in Sanaa.

On Feb 3, Saudi Arabia announced tougher punishments for Saudis seeking to join Islamist militant groups abroad and on March 7 the interior ministry designated a number of groups, including the Brotherhood, as terrorist organisations. In the group's first public response to the measures, senior AQAP official Ibrahim al-Rubaysh said of the Saudi authorities in an audio tape posted online: 'Their employers are the White House.' He added that Riyadh appeared to consider the U.S. authorities as 'gods.' Jail threat: The laws will treat non-believers much like terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda (above) Addressing pro-government Muslim preachers in Saudi Arabia, Rubaysh said: 'You are more American than the Americans themselves.' Under the new measures, Saudi Arabia will jail for up to 20 years any citizen who fights in conflicts abroad - an apparent move to deter Saudis from joining rebels in Syria and then posing a security risk once they return home.

Saudi Arabia's Islamic religious authorities have spoken out against Saudi fighters going to Syria, but the Interior Ministry estimates that around 1,200 Saudis have gone nonetheless. Riyadh fears returning fighters will target the ruling Al Saud royal family - as happened after the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

An appeal contained in the counter-terrorism measures for fighters to turn themselves in had not been answered, Rubaysh said, adding that this showed 'there is no weight on the hearts of the mujahideen (holy warriors)'.

Saudi authorities also fear the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Sunni Islamist doctrines challenge the Saudi principle of dynastic rule, has tried to build support inside the kingdom since the Arab Spring revolutions. In Egypt, the Brotherhood, which won every election after the toppling of veteran leader Hosni Mubarak in 2011, has been driven underground since the army deposed President Mohamed Mursi, a member of the group which also suffered repression in the Mubarak era.

Rubaysh said the listing of the Brotherhood as a terrorist group sent 'a message for all groups who are softening their processes and abandoning some of their principles' that they would never be accepted by the 'heads of disbelief'. 'Heads of disbelief' is a phrase used by al Qaeda to indicate secular or pro-Western authorities. 'It is required to stand firm unto death if we desire the satisfaction of Allah,' Rubaysh said.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2594139/Saudi-Arabia-declares-atheists-terrorists-new-laws.html

Quran: "Extremist Literature"

1000+ MISTAKES IN THE QURAN http://www.1000mistakes.com  

 

• Book A: "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". (NB: Because we found "1000+ Comments on the Quran" to be more urgent, the missing small chapters will be delayed from 2010 to 2013 - and then our "Project Quran" will be complete.)

• Book B: "1000+ Comments on Jihad and Holy War - included the greed, lust, superiority complex, twisted moral code, and apartheid rules (we do not mention Nazi-like ones) + the distaste-, hate-, and warmongering which together made/make it possible".

• Book C: "Tit-bits from 1000+ Comments on the Quran - skeptics' facts and thoughts". ("1000+ Mistakes in the Quran" is said on Internet to be the most dangerous book Islam has ever met, because it proves 100% and beyond any doubt - though not beyond blindness, naivety or wishful thinking - that something is seriously wrong with the Quran, and thus with Muhammad and Islam - - - and because it is so easy for everybody to check that the information is correct. "1000+ Comments on the Quran" may be a good no. 2).

• Book D: "CORRECTING WRONG REFUTING OF SOME POINTS IN www.1000mistakes.com". This seems to be the best "refuting" Islam has to offer - at least it is highest ranked on Google. It is unbelieveable that so wrong facts, wrong logic, twisted "information", etc. can be used and have effect - and as unbelieveable that nobody "arrests" the false points. The reason must be that Muslims are so used to accept what religious authorities claim, that they forget about al-Taqiyya (lawful lie), Kitman (lawful half-truth), etc., and never check anything themselves. Read it and weep - or laugh.

• Book E: "THE BIBLE AND THE QURAN: 1000+ comments on the Quran's connection to the Bible - 'Biblical' stuff not from the Bible, other differences, etc. + some for those who do not know the Bible or the Quran to well.

• Book F: "1000+ Comments on the Quran - skeptic's facts and thoughts, THE COMPLETE BOOK. (Intended to be the last book in our 'Project Quran'). Faith Freedom International (FFI) says about this book: "This book is monumental. It is just amazing. I am trying to change the template of FFI, and I will certainly place a permanenet link to it in the home page. - - - Thank you for this great work. Ali". (Ali Sina is the leader of FFI.)

• Book G: "1000+ False proofs and claims". Twisting and dishonest use of science + made up miracles, foretellings, etc. in Islam.

• Book H: "Comments on the Quran arranged by themes". New June 2013!

#You will find pages on Internet trying to refute especially "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran". Please read them, but check their claims, information and "information" - laugh at their mistakes and naivety, be stupefied at the lack of real knowledge, weep at the dishonesty (Islam is the only of the big religions which not only accepts, but often advises the use of dishonesty - al-Taqiyya, Kitman, deceit and even broken words/oaths (see separate chapters in "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran) - to promote or defend "the Religion of Truth" (quite an ironic slogan for a religion partly relying on dishonesty)).

As for "1000+ Mistakes in the Quran" and all the mistakes, contradictions, cases of invalid logic and of unclear language, etc. in that book: One or a few mistakes, etc. could be accepted even from an omniscient god, as the ones writing it down might have made errors (the Quran is claimed sent down by Allah, but necessarily copied by humans). But to be able to believe such a god have such a bad command of the language, that humans have to explain away mistakes, etc. with "what he really meant" or "parable", etc. hundreds of times and more + hundreds of contradictions and cases of invalid logic and of unclear language, etc., takes a blindness, naivety or wishful thinking far beyond the incredible and deep into the unbelievable.

Another fact about the language: Muslims like to boast of how elegant Arab is used in the Quran - they even claim it is so elegant that it must be made by the god! (There exists no proofs for Allah, and they try to find such ones wherever there is a possibility.) And thank you very much for a nice language - it was polished for some 250 years (from ca. 650 AD to ca. 900 AD) by some of the best brains Islam had. But the elegance of the language just is the wrapping - it does not help very much with an elegant and exquisite wrapping paper, if the contents are low quality and/or invalid. (A holy book clearly not backed by a god, is invalid as a basis for a true religion. Such a book at best is a collection of legends or fairy tales and a basis for superstition - and for power for the leaders - or at worst a tool for dark forces.)

RUSH: " If You Really Want To Go To The Shadows, Go To A Mosque"

ISLAMIC DOCTRINE "SHARIAH"

Shariah: The Threat to America

Centre for Security Policy

This study is the result of months of analysis, discussion and drafting by a group of top security policy experts concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as "shariah." It is designed to provide a comprehensive and articulate "second opinion" on the official characterizations and assessments of this threat as put forth by the United States government. This study challenges the assumptions underpinning the official line in the conflict with today's totalitarian threat, which is currently euphemistically described as "violent extremism," and the policies of co-existence, accommodation and submission that are rooted in those assumptions.

Distinguished contributors to the report include:

Team Leaders:

LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM G. "JERRY" BOYKIN, US Army (Ret.), former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence
LIEUTENANT GENERAL HARRY EDWARD SOYSTER, US Army (Ret.), former Director, Defense Intelligence Agency

Associates:

AMBASSADOR HENRY COOPER, former Chief Negotiator, Defense and Space Talks, former Director, Strategic Defense Initiative
* STEPHEN C. COUGHLIN, ESQ., Major (Res.) USA, former Senior Consultant, Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
* MICHAEL DEL ROSSO, Senior Fellow, Claremont Institute and Center for Security Policy
* FRANK J. GAFFNEY, JR., former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (Acting), President, Center for Security Policy
* JOHN GUANDOLO, former Special Agent, Counter-Terrorism Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation
* ADMIRAL JAMES A. "ACE" LYONS, US Navy (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet
* BRIAN KENNEDY, President, Claremont Institute
* CLARE M. LOPEZ, Senior Fellow, Center for Security Policy
* ANDREW C. MCCARTHY, former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney; Senior Fellow, National Review Institute; Contributing Editor, National Review
* PATRICK POOLE, Consultant to the military and law enforcement on anti-terrorism issues
* JOSEPH E. SCHMITZ, former Inspector General, Department of Defense
* TOM TRENTO, Executive Director, Florida Security Council
* J. MICHAEL WALLER, Annenberg Professor of International Communication, Institute of World Politics, and Vice President for Information Operations, Center for Security Policy
* DIANA WEST, author and columnist
* R. JAMES WOOLSEY, former Director of Central Intelligence
* DAVID YERUSHALMI, ESQ., General Counsel to the Center for Security Policy

** UPDATE **
The Team B II Report, Shariah: The Threat to America, is now available as a 370-page paperback volume at Amazon.com for $14.00

Click the cover to order a copy today. > MORE <4

 

Sunna - Deceiving the Professionally Gullible Published on Feb 5, 2014 One of the most discouraging things about dealing with Islam is how leadership has learned nothing in the years since Sept 11, 2001. Leadership's favorite fantasy is that Islam is whatever a Muslim wants to say it is. So if you want a nice Islam, ask a nice imam. But, would a Muslim deceive the Kafir (non-Muslim)? Mohammed did.

OBAMA'S ISLAMIC MILITARY PENTAGON: new rules to allow Islamic beards, turbans and hijabs

The Pentagon’s Bow to Islamic Extremism Raymond Ibrahim

“Caving to pressure from Muslim groups, the Pentagon has relaxed uniform rules to allow Islamic beards, turbans and hijabs. It’s a major win for political correctness and a big loss for military unit cohesion,” said a recent report.

This new relaxation of rules for Muslims comes at a time when the FBI is tracking more than 100 suspected jihadi-infiltrators of the U.S. military. Just last month, Craig Benedict Baxam, a former Army soldier and convert to Islam, was sentenced to seven years in prison due to his al-Qaeda/jihadi activities. Also last month, Mozaffar Khazaee, an Iranian-American working for the Defense Department, was arrested for sending secret documents to America’s enemy, Iran.

According to a Pentagon spokesperson, the new religious accommodations—to allow Islamic beards, turbans, and hijabs—which took effect very recently, would “reduce both the instances and perception of discrimination among those whose religious expressions are less familiar to the command.”

The report concludes that, “Making special accommodations for Islam will only attract more Muslims into the military at a time when two recent terror cases highlight the ongoing danger of Muslims in uniform.”

But it’s worse than that; for not only will it attract “more Muslims,” it will attract precisely the wrong kinds of Muslims, AKA, “Islamists,” “radicals,” etc.

This is easily demonstrated by connecting the dots and understanding that Muslims who adhere to visible, non-problematic aspects of Islam—growing beards and donning hijabs—often indicate their adherence to non-visible, problematic aspects of Islam.

Consider it this way: Why do some Muslim men wear the prescribed beard and why do some Muslim women wear the prescribed hijab? Most Muslims would say they do so because Islam’s prophet Muhammad commanded them to (whether via the Koran or Hadith).

Regarding the Muslim beard, Muhammad wanted his followers to look different from “infidels,” namely Christians and Jews, so he ordered his followers to “trim closely the moustache and grow the beard.” Accordingly, all Sunni schools of law maintain that it is forbidden—a “major sin”—for men to shave their beards (unless, of course, it is part of a stratagem against the infidel, in which case it is permissible). The question begs itself: If such Muslims meticulously follow the minor, “outer” things of Islam simply because their prophet made some utterances concerning them in the Hadith, logically speaking, does that not indicate that they also follow, or at the very least accept as legitimate, the major, “inner” themes Muhammad constantly emphasized in both the Koran and Hadith—such as enmity for and deceit of the infidel, and, when capable, perpetual jihad? Even in the Islamic world this connection between visible indicators of Islamic piety and jihadi tendencies are well known. Back in 2011, when Islamists were dominating Egypt’s politics, secularist talk show host Amr Adib of Cairo Today mocked the then calls for a “million man beard” march with his trademark sarcasm: “This is a great endeavor! After all, a man with a beard can never be a thug, can never rape a woman in the street, can never set a church on fire, can never fight and quarrel, can never steal, and can never be dishonest!”

His sarcasm was not missed on his Egyptian viewership which knew quite well that it is precisely those Muslims who most closely follow the minutia of Muhammad—for example, by growing a beard—that are most prone to violence, deceit, and anti-infidel sentiments, all of which were also advocated by Islam’s prophet.

Speaking more seriously, Adib had added that this issue is not about growing a beard, but rather, “once you grow your beard, you give proof of your commitment and fealty to everything in Islam.” Similarly, after Egypt’s June 30 Revolution ousted the Muslim Brotherhood, “overt signs of piety [beards and hijabs] have become all it takes to attract suspicion from security forces at Cairo checkpoints and vigilantes looking to attack Islamists.” Clubs and restaurants banned entrance to those wearing precisely these two “overt signs of piety.”

While Egyptians instinctively understand how fealty to the Muslim beard evinces fealty, or at least acceptance, to all those other problematic things Muhammad commanded, even in fuzzy Western op-eds, the connection sometimes peeks out. Consider the following excerpt from a New York Times piece titled

“Behold the Mighty Beard, a Badge of Piety and Religious Belonging”:

[A]ll over the Muslim world, the full beard has come to connote piety and spiritual fervor…. Of course, the beard is only a sign of righteousness. It is no guarantor, as Mr. Zulfiqar [a Muslim interviewee] reminds us: “I recall one gentleman who came back from a trip to Pakistan and remarked to me, ‘I learned one thing: the longer the beard, the bigger the crook.’ His anticipation was people with big beards would be really honest, but he kept meeting people lying to him.”

The italicized portion speaks for itself. Whereas the Muslim beard ostensibly represents religious piety, some people, mostly Westerners, are shocked to find that those who wear it are often “crooks” and “liars.”

In Islam, however, outer signs of religiosity on the one hand, and corruption and deceit on the other, are quite compatible. After all, the same source—Islam’s prophet Muhammad, as recorded in the Hadith—that tells Muslims to grow a beard also advocates deception, the plundering of infidels, the keeping of sex slaves, adult “breast feeding,” and all sorts of other practices antithetical to Western notions of piety if not decency.

Incidentally, it’s the same with the hijab, or cloak that some Muslim women wear, also on Muhammad’s command. One reformed Islamic jihadi from Egypt accurately observes that “the proliferation of the hijab is strongly correlated with increased terrorism…. Terrorism became much more frequent in such societies as Indonesia, Egypt, Algeria, and the U.K. after the hijab became prevalent among Muslim women living in those communities.”

And so, at a time when the U.S. should at the very least be wary of those who openly wear their Islamic radicalism around their face and head—beards for males, hijabs for females—the U.S. Pentagon (of all places) is embracing them in “celebration of multiculturalism.” Wear loyalty to the U.S. is most needed, the Pentagon embraces those who show that their loyalty is elsewhere (among other things, the beard and hijab are meant to separate “pure believers” from “impure infidels”).

Of course, none of this is surprising considering that the Pentagon also considers Evangelical Christians and Catholics as “extremists” on a par with al-Qaeda.

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/islam/the-pentagons-bow-to-islamic-extremism 

Barack Hussein Obama invites the "Muslim Brotherhood" to "A New Beginning" speech he delivered on 4 June 2009, from Cairo University in Egypt. Al-Azhar University co-hosted where the "Muslim Brotherhood" sat in the front row, applauding a major "Islamic Coup D'état".

Shariah: The Threat to America

Centre for Security Policy

 

This study is the result of months of analysis, discussion and drafting by a group of top security policy experts concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as "shariah." It is designed to provide a comprehensive and articulate "second opinion" on the official characterizations and assessments of this threat as put forth by the United States government. This study challenges the assumptions underpinning the official line in the conflict with today's totalitarian threat, which is currently euphemistically described as "violent extremism," and the policies of co-existence, accommodation and submission that are rooted in those assumptions.

Distinguished contributors to the report include:

Team Leaders:

LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM G. "JERRY" BOYKIN, US Army (Ret.), former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence
LIEUTENANT GENERAL HARRY EDWARD SOYSTER, US Army (Ret.), former Director, Defense Intelligence Agency

Associates:

AMBASSADOR HENRY COOPER, former Chief Negotiator, Defense and Space Talks, former Director, Strategic Defense Initiative
* STEPHEN C. COUGHLIN, ESQ., Major (Res.) USA, former Senior Consultant, Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
* MICHAEL DEL ROSSO, Senior Fellow, Claremont Institute and Center for Security Policy
* FRANK J. GAFFNEY, JR., former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (Acting), President, Center for Security Policy
* JOHN GUANDOLO, former Special Agent, Counter-Terrorism Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation
* ADMIRAL JAMES A. "ACE" LYONS, US Navy (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet
* BRIAN KENNEDY, President, Claremont Institute
* CLARE M. LOPEZ, Senior Fellow, Center for Security Policy
* ANDREW C. MCCARTHY, former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney; Senior Fellow, National Review Institute; Contributing Editor, National Review
* PATRICK POOLE, Consultant to the military and law enforcement on anti-terrorism issues
* JOSEPH E. SCHMITZ, former Inspector General, Department of Defense
* TOM TRENTO, Executive Director, Florida Security Council
* J. MICHAEL WALLER, Annenberg Professor of International Communication, Institute of World Politics, and Vice President for Information Operations, Center for Security Policy
* DIANA WEST, author and columnist
* R. JAMES WOOLSEY, former Director of Central Intelligence
* DAVID YERUSHALMI, ESQ., General Counsel to the Center for Security Policy

** UPDATE **
The Team B II Report, Shariah: The Threat to America, is now available as a 370-page paperback volume at Amazon.com for $14.00

Click the cover to order a copy today. > MORE <4


Print Print | Sitemap
© Spy Theater